morfology

The previous summary presented derivation as one process that allows us to introduce new words into a language. While derivation is generally assumed to be the most productive word formation process, there are several others.

Compounding

Compounds are possibly those multimorphemic words that we most readily identify as consisting of several parts. In a compound several free morphemes are combined, resulting in a word that often derives its meaning from the combination of its components.

classroom = class + room

skyscraper = sky + scraper

wallpaper = wall + paper

In English, compounds are often not written as single words but separated or combined by a hyphen (e.g. dry cleaner, on-line). In contrast to this, German compounds are usually spelled as a single word and compounding is an extremely productive word formation process in German (e.g. Hochschulrektorenkonferenz, Karnevalswochenende, …).

Note that while noun + noun compounds are frequent, other combinations also abound and the result must not be a noun.

talkshow
verb + noun = noun

tightrope
adjective + noun = noun

overshadow
preposition + noun = verb

Many compounds exhibit a so-called modifier-head structure, with one part specifying the other in terms of meaning. Thus a blackboard is a kind of board and a talkshow is a kind of show (not a kind of black or a kind of talk). The modifier may function in different ways, e.g. a raincoat is not a coat for but against rain.

While the abovementioned examples are endocentric (i.e. the meaning of the compound is derived from the meaning of the parts) there are some compounds where this is not the case. A redhead is not a type of head but a person with red hair. Such compounds are called exocentric, because their meaning is not strictly contained in the components.

Conversion

Another highly productive word formation process is conversion, which is the term used to describe a word class change without any morphological marking.

party (noun) -> party (verb)
We will be at the party
They like to party

must (verb) -> must (noun)
You must eat your soup
It is a must that you call him

Note that we only speak of conversion when it is clear that a word has been “copied” from one word class to another. Frequently words appear similar without having been converted (at least not recently) – for example, English like exists as a verb, a noun, an adjective or a filler/discourse marker.

Borrowing

When a word is imported from another language we describe this process as borrowing. While German also has a large and increasing number of borrowings, especially from English, English itself is well-known for its mixed vocabulary and overall affinity for foreign words. Some words from Latin and Greek (e.g. strata – street, episkopos – bishop) were imported into a large number Indo-European languages before English even existed, emphasizing that borrowing is in no way a novel process. A few examples that illustrate the mixed vocabulary of English:

avalanche – from Romansch via French

bizarre – from Basque via French

candy – from Arabic and possibly Sanskrit via French

coffee – from Arabic via Turkish and Italian

ketchup – from Malay via Amoy Chinese

schadenfreude – from German

French has contributed a very large portion of English loan words and often borrowed words take on different meanings due to competition with indigenous terms (cf. Old English great with Norse big and French large).

Clipping

Shortening longer words is a popular strategy for conserving breath when speaking and space when writing or typing. Clipping or trimming words in the front or back (and sometimes both) is thus another word formation process in English.

air plane -> plane
front clipping

advertisement -> ad
back clipping

influenza -> flu
front and back clipping

Blending

Blends are combinations of two or more words in which the sound patterns overlap. Often parts of either or both words are reduced or lost in the blend, though usually the initial components are still recognizable.

brunch = breakfast + lunch

motel = motor + hotel

smog = smoke + fog

Initialisms and Acronyms

Other forms of shortenings are initialisms (also called alphabetisms) and acronyms, which reduce each component word to its initial letter. The difference between to two types lies in how the resulting word is pronounced in spoken language, namely letter by letter or without intermission.

Initialisms: TV, CD, MP3, SUV, YMCA, STFU

Acronyms: UNESCO, NATO, LOL, WYSIWYG, KISS

Back-formation

Sometimes speakers of a language will analyze a word as containing affixes where none are present. By removing these assumed affixes a lexeme can be back-formed.

editor
to edit

babysitter
to babysit

“Morphological oddities”

When critically looking at what you’ve learned about morphology and word formation to this point, you are bound to notice that the harmonious abstractions of the terminology aren’t entirely perfect. Some phenomena such as cranberry morphemes (see below) demonstrate that morphemes are idealized and do not always correspond neatly with atomic units of information. The following “oddities” stand out in English:

Zero morphs

A zero morph is a morph that should analytically be there, but that is not represented. A zero (Ø) is often used to indicate the “invisible” morph.

two cats = (ROOT) + -s (PLURAL)
two sheep = (ROOT) + Ø (PLURAL)

I like = (ROOT) + Ø (Non-3. Pers. sing.)
She likes = (ROOT) + -s (3. Pers. sing.)

Note that regarding noun plurals, one should not confuse zero morphs with mass nouns. Mass nouns such as water or metal simply do not have a plural, whereas sheep merely has no visible marking of the plural.

Portmanteau morphs

Some inflectional morphemes encode more than just a single grammatical property. These are called portmanteau morphs, because they contain several items inside a single shell (a portmanteau is a large suitcase).

he sleeps
+ 3. person
+ singular
+ present tense

my cat
+ 1. person
+ singular

Note that this is not to be confused with distinct morphemes which are realized with similar-looking morphs, such as -s as the realization of the plural morpheme vs. -s indicating third person singular.

Cranberry morphemes

Sometimes we encounter morphemes which are neither affixes nor genuine free morphemes. Such unique morphemes (which are occasionally also called cranberry morphemes) pose problems for analysis.

blackberry
strawberry
blueberry
cranberry
mulberry

Black, straw and blue are lexical morphemes – but what’s a cran or a mul? Cranberry morphemes are most often introduced into a language via borrowing or dialectal variation and therefore only occur in a fixed morphological constellation. They are sometimes described as fossilized terms due to the fact that they can no longer be separately analyzed or used productively to form new words.

Key Terms

• word formation processes
• derivation
• compounding
• endocentric – exocentric
• conversion
• borrowing
• clipping
• blending
• initialisms and acronyms
• back-formation
• morphological oddities
• zero morphs
• portmanteau morphs
• cranberry morphemes

Tasks

Read this New York Times column and find out what word formation processes William Safire unknowingly mentions.

http://introling.ynada.com/category/morphology

WORD COINAGE – MORPHOLOGY

Posted on November 24, 2011 by journeyoffeni

New words maybe added to the vocabulary or lexicon of a language by derivational processes. New words may also enter a langugae in a variety of other ways.
Madison Avenue has addes many new words to English, such as kodak,nylon,orlon,and Dacron. Spesific brand names such as xerox;kleenex,jell-o;brillo;and vaseline. Noptice that some of these words were created from existing words: kleenex from the word clean and jell+o from gel, for example.
1. Compound
= is a word consisted by more than one word.
E.g.: rainbow; boyfriend
2. Acronyms
= are formby taking the initial letters of the words in phares or title and pronouncing them as a word.
E.g.: unesco; unicef, ram; aids; ucla; nasa; laser
3. Blends
= are words that are created from nonmorphemic parts of two already existing items.
E.g.: smoke+fog = smog; motor+hotel = motel
4. Back-formations
= is a process that creates a new word by removing a realor supposed affix from another word in the language.
E.g. : editor from edit; hawker from hawk
5. abbreviations
= can called by clipping which is a process that shorterns a polysyllabic word by deleting one or more syllabes.
E.g. : prof from profesor; gym from gymnastic
6. Words from names
= in vocabulary addition (word coinage) is also revealed by the number of words in English vocabulary that derive from proper names of individuals or places.
e.g. : sandwich; robot; gargantuan; jumbo

http://journeyoffeni.wordpress.com/2011/11/24/word-coinage-morphology/

43, 44, 45. Clippings, Coinage, and Morphological Misanaylsis

Not too long ago, we learned the origins of the term, "nickname." The term used to be "ekename," which was a compound word for "additional name." The misunderstanding of the phrase "an ekename" led to it becoming "a nekename." Now we simply know it as a nickname.

This totally blew my mind. I raised my hand and said that I always thought that it was called a nickname because you were "nicking" a part from your name. For example, my name is Samantha but I go by Sam. I thought my 'nickname' was Sam because I "nicked" it from Samantha. Doctor Howard reminded me that 'Sam' from 'Samantha' is an example of a clipping, and that my misunderstanding was a great example of a morphological misanalysis.

A clipping is exactly what it sounds like-- a shortening of a longer word into a smaller one. Like Sam from Samantha, or exam from examination. A morphological misanalysis, or false/folk etymology, is when a word or phrase is misheard or misanalyzed (like my misunderstanding of why we call it a 'nickname'). This happens a lot in songs; we mishear the lyrics and so we think the song says something entirely different (I get made fun of for this all the time). Other examples (provided in our course-pack) would be take it for granite instead of take it for granted, or chester drawers from chest of drawers (this was one I said when I was little, except I think I said cheshire-- ironically enough, I had a set of drawers that had Alice in Wonderland characters on it).

Thinking about all of this reminded me of my earlier entry about southern accents and the "pop versus soda" debate. I used to say coke instead of pop or soda, and I thought maybe this was a morphological misanalysis on my part when I was young. But I quickly realized that it was not this but another English word formation process-- coinage.

In North Carolina, every soft drink was called a coke, not just Coca-Cola. Just like we tend to call all tissue Kleenex, or instead of saying we're going to copy it, we are going to xerox it. This seems like the same thing to me.

It is really interesting (and oddly exciting) to discover a term for something I said in my childhood.

http://samantha-waters.blogspot.com/2011/04/ekename.html